type
sm-banner
background-image
background-image-mobile
background-color
navy
eyebrow
Article
title

U.S. tariffs and Canada's response: Uncertainty complicates tariff mitigation

subtitle
Canada combats U.S. tariffs with reciprocal measures
date
March 05, 2025
text-color
light
gradient-overlay
dark
breadcrumb

Home

Insights

Services

Business tax

  • Supply chain
  • Federal tax
  • Business tax
  • International tax
  • Transfer pricing

Executive summary

The ongoing tariff dispute between the U.S. and Canada has led to significant measures from both countries. As the situation remains dynamic, key strategies for Canadian businesses to manage these risks include using bonded warehouses, transfer pricing, tariff engineering, and diversifying supply chains.

U.S. tariffs on most Canadian goods—and Canada’s reciprocal measures—went into effect March 4 following a month-long delay. While tariffs on some Canadian goods were subsequently paused, tremendous trade uncertainty remains on both sides of the border.

The tariff situation continues to evolve as the U.S. administration eyes new products for protective tariffs and Canada rolls out its response at the federal and provincial levels.

Although the ongoing uncertainty makes planning tariff mitigation more complicated, the following strategies are still available for middle market companies:

You can read more about the ongoing tariff dispute below. The measures detailed below were accurate as of March 24 and are subject to change.

U.S. tariffs on Canada

The following tariffs impacting goods originating from Canada have been confirmed by executive order or official statement from the White House.

The term “CUSMA goods” refers to goods which meet the Canada-United States-Mexico Free Trade Agreement (CUSMA) rules of origin for goods originating in the territory of Canada, the US and Mexico. Generally speaking, CUSMA goods will be wholly obtained or produced in North America, and/or meet requirements on regional content, processing or changes in tariff classification outlined in the CUSMA.

Scheduled effective date Amount Affected goods
March 4 – March 6 10% Energy and energy resources[1]
March 4 – March 6 25% All, except energy and energy resources
March 7 10% Energy, energy resources, and potash which are not CUSMA goods
March 7 25% All non-CUSMA goods not captured in the 10% tariff.
March 12 25% Steel and aluminium products and derivatives

Products whose value does not exceed US $800 will qualify for the  de minimis  exemption to the tariffs. The exception is only a temporary reprieve for goods subject to the March 7 tariffs as it will be removed once systems are in place to collect tariffs on these low-value imports.

U.S. President Donald Trump has also indicated the administration is considering the following additional tariffs. The details, including countries impacted, are not publicly finalized.

Scheduled effective date Details
April 2 Reciprocal tariffs
April 2 Automobiles and agricultural products
Unknown Approximately 25% tariff on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals

Along with the previously announced tariffs, the U.S. has indicated it is conducting reviews into other areas of concern:

Canada’s tariff response

On March 4, then-prime minister Justin Trudeau said that Canada would implement a two-phase tariff response originally announced on Feb. 1, along with initiating disputes before the World Trade Organization (WTO) and using the CUSMA dispute resolution measures.

The federal government introduced further actions intended to support businesses and workers domestically, including access to the work-sharing measures under employment insurance (EI), deferring corporate income tax payments and GST/HST remittances from April 2, 2025 to June 30, 2025 and working with premiers to lower interprovincial barriers to trade.

Innovation Minister François-Philippe Champagne announced the guidance to the Investment Canada Act will be updated to require consideration of Canada’s economic security in allowing foreign acquisitions of or mergers with Canadian companies.

Canada’s response includes a 25 per cent tariff imposed on a subset of goods originating from the U.S. on March 4 and an extension of that tariff to a further list of goods following a consultation period that is scheduled to end April 2. This tariff applies to both commercial and personal-use goods.

On March 12, the federal government moved up the tariff implementation on a number of goods originally included in its second phase to March 13 in response to U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs.

The following is a non-exhaustive and high-level list of impacted goods:

Initial group of goods

You can find a full list from the federal government in this release.

March 13 goods

You can find a full list from the federal government in this release.

Post-consultation group of goods

You can find a full list from the federal government in this release.

These tariffs will not apply to:

Importers will be able to make use of Canada’s duties relief and duty drawback programs (subject to CUSMA) to bypass tariffs or receive a refund of tariffs on previously imported goods which are exported from Canada. A remission process is additionally available to request exceptional relief.

Provincial responses to U.S. measures

Many Canadian provinces are introducing their own responses to U.S. tariffs using measures within their jurisdiction—while some premiers are pushing to lower barriers to interprovincial trade.

Outlined below are measures from the provincial governments of Alberta, British Columbia, Quebec and Ontario. The roll-out of these provinces’ respective budgets is being covered here.

Alberta

Alberta announced it will no longer be purchasing alcohol or video lottery terminals from the U.S., nor will government entities—both provincial and municipal—be making purchases of goods and services from the U.S.

British Columbia

B.C. announced that its liquor stores will no longer sell products from Republican-led states and it will prioritize non-U.S. suppliers for government contracts.

B.C. has introduced legislation to allow the provincial government to bypass its legislature in imposing laws meant to respond to tariff threats, lower tariff barriers between provinces or protect the economic interests of both the country and province. The legislation also introduces tolls for non-Canadian commercial trucks transiting through the province that would be automatically repealed in 2027.

B.C. is also looking to require Canadian produced low-carbon biofuels to be used in gas and diesel.

Ontario

The province-run LCBO has removed U.S. alcohol from its shelves, and U.S. companies will no longer be considered in government procurement and infrastructure contracts. Ontario Premier Doug Ford indicated he is considering other measures as well.

Quebec

Quebec’s government asked the province-run SAQ to no longer sell or supply U.S. alcohol. The province will also impose a penalty of 25 per cent on U.S. companies bidding on government contracts without an existing presence in Quebec.  Quebec said it will support affected domestic businesses by allowing companies to qualify for up to $50 million in liquidity loans with a maximum term of seven years.

[1] Includes crude oil, natural gas, lease condensates, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products, uranium, coal, biofuels, geothermal heat, the kinetic movement of flowing water and critical minerals

Section Title
Section Subtitle
Layout
feature
Pages
  • /insights/services/business-tax-insights/tariff-rates-explained-key-factors-tariffs-imported-goods
  • /insights/services/business-tax-insights/us-introduces-tariffs-canada-responds-with-countermeasures
  • /insights/tax-alerts/2025/tax-strategies-to-address-tariffs-impact-on-supply-chains-consumer-products
  • /insights/services/business-tax-insights/canadian-businesses-should-reevaluate-transfer-pricing-amid-us-tariffthreats
Cards per Row
3
Number of Rows
2
Order By
title
Sort Order
ascending
Show CTA Button
false
Override CTA Label
Load more
Carousel On Mobile
false
Carousel Swiper Text
Link Target
Same Tab